Friday, November 16, 2012

Changing Climates: The most likely theory for Neanderthal extinction?

After Homo sapiens migrated out of Africa, and into Europe, the Marine Isotope Stage record, Oxygen Isotope Stage record, pollen cores, ice cores, and speleothems tells us there was a major climate change. Firstly, what exactly are pollen cores, and isotope levels??  

Lets begin. . . 
 To begin, Marine Isotope  Stages and Oxygen Isotope Stages are the same thing. These isotopes come from measuring oxygen in the microscopic skeletons of foraminifera (forams, for short) that lived on the sea floor.  This measure can be used as an indicator of changing temperature and glacial ice over time. There are two main trends: one toward an overall decrease in temperature, the other toward a larger degree of climate fluctuation. The amount of variability in environmental conditions became greater in later stages of human evolution than in the earlier stages.

(Source: Smithsonian Institution. (2012). Climate effects on human evolution. Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://humanorigins.si.edu/research/climate-research/effects)
 
Next, Pollen Cores are core samples of a medium containing a stratigraphic sequence of pollen. Analysis of the type and frequency of the pollen in each layer is used to study changes in climate or land use using regional vegetation as a proxy. This analysis is conceptually comparable to the study of ice cores. They tell us about climate change because depending on the weather, certain plants would be present or not.

(Source: Wikipedia. (October 13th, 2010). Pollen core. Wikipedia. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollen_core)

Next, an Ice Core is a core sample that is typically removed from an ice sheet, most commonly from the polar ice caps of Antarctica, Greenland, or from high mountain glaciers elsewhere. As the ice forms from the incremental build up of annual layers of snow, lower layers are older than upper, and an ice core contains ice formed over a range of years. The properties of the ice and the recrystallized inclusions within the ice can then be used to reconstruct a climatic record over the age range of the core, normally through isotopic analysis. This enables the reconstruction of local temperature records and the history of atmospheric composition.
 (Source: Wikipedia. (October 10th, 2012). Ice core. Wikipedia. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_core)
 
This article also offers fascinating insight to the process of obtaining and analyzing ice cores via the process of Paleoclimatology  



Lastly, Speleothems, commonly known as a cave formation, is a secondary mineral deposit formed in a cave. Speleothems are typically formed in limestone or dolostone solutional caves. Samples can be taken from speleothems to be used like ice cores as a proxy record of past climate changes. A particular strength of speleothems in this regard is their unique ability to be accurately dated over much of the late Quatenary period using the uranium-thorium dating technique. Stalagmites are particularly useful for palaeo-climate applications because of their relatively simple geometry and because they contain several different climate records, such as oxygen and carbon isotopes and trace cations. These can provide clues to past precipitation, temperature, and vegetation changes over the last ~ 500,000 years.

(Source: Wikipedia. (October 10th, 2012). Speleothem. Wikipedia. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speleothem)


 
Now that we know how researchers, and archaeologists alike, recreate the climate of our past, we can look at how it affected both Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Professor Chris Stringer, of London's Natural History Museum says:
For many years, people assumed that it was an overall superiority of modern humans: that modern humans were more intelligent, that they had better technology, or had more effective adaptations."They thought that when they came into Neanderthal regions, the Neanderthals very quickly disappeared, because they were out-competed. What we've learnt recently, is that the story was much more complicated. There probably wasn't a single cause of the Neanderthal extinction. They may have died out in different places for different reasons, but an exceptionally cold and variable climate might have driven the disappearance of Ice Age animals upon which the Neanderthals relied for food. In addition, climate change probably cleared Europe of its forests, creating an open environment that did not favour the Neanderthals.
(Source: Rincon, P. (February 13th, 2009). Did climate kill off the neanderthals?. BBC News. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7873373.stm)

How do they know this? Using the aforementioned climatic recreation tools (i.e. pollen and ice cores): 
You can take any radiocarbon date from anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere and you can then map it on to the climate record of that particular site. So, for example, if you have a date of 24,000, you go down the core and say 'where do I get 24,000 radiocarbon years in that core' and then you see what the climate was doing - it's as simple as that.
(Source: Rincon, P. (February 13th, 2009). Did climate kill off the neanderthals?. BBC News. Retrieved on November 15th, 2012, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7873373.stm)

This technique is how scientists know there was an unusually cold spell. It is now known as the Heinreich 2 Event. I know what you're thinking to yourself: Neanderthal morphology tells us that they were adapted for the cold weather, though? This is true, but it is thought the Neanderthal's inability to adapt their hunting and living methods to drastic swings in the climate ultimately led to their extinction. Europe suddenly became a barren steppe land, and Neanderthals were thought to have largely been hunting woodland animals. 

So why didn't Homo sapiens go extinct when this happened? In my discussion of lithics, I mentioned that Homo sapiens had vastly increased the size of their tool kit, through making more refine and slender microliths. This allowed them to occupy a much larger ecological niche, and broaden the types of foods being eaten and hunted, than the Neanderthals (who still largely used traditional Mousterian tools). These facts, coupled with a string of major volcanic eruptions 40,000 years BP which affected large portions of Europe, is most likely what sealed the Neanderthal fate. 

 The Neanderthals may have gone extinct, but they leave behind a vast legacy of innovation, and they continue to teach us about how we came to be truly modern Homo sapiens. I leave you with a two part documentary produced by the Discovery Channel, that highlights the accomplishments, lifestyles, technological advancements, and hardships that the Neanderthals endured. Enjoy!



Thursday, November 15, 2012

Interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens

I think that one of the most important topics to explore when trying to uncover the reason why Neanderthals went extinct and Homo sapiens did not, is the theory of extinction due to interbreeding with one another. Below are several videos (all found on YouTube), that help explain the potential (or actuality) and the ramifications of sexual interbreeding between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. I hope you enjoy them!







Does body morphology matter?

What does the morphology of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals tell us about the Neanderthal extinction?


The cartoon above shows the typical "Neanderthals were less intelligent" notion, but it also carries the underlying tone that they were less intelligent due to their morphology and physiology. Let me start by getting the "boring" stuff out of the way. In order to be able to process how the morphology of early hominids has affected the development of culture, artistry, and everyday lifestyle practices, we must look at the straight facts: What are the morphological features of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals? How are they similar, and how are they different?

Morphological Features of Homo Sapiens (Anatomically Modern Humans)



Cranial Features:    
  • Average Cranial Capactiy: ≈1300 cc
  • Lack a bipartite brow with a more bulging medial portion.
  • Conchal crest that marks the anterior articulation of the inferior nasal concha.
  • A parabolic palate.
  • A prominent mental eminence.
  • Short base and high brain case.
  • Skull is broadest on top.
  • Very little, if any, post-orbital constriction or narrowing behind the eye sockets.
  • Short jaws, which result in an almost vertical face.
  • Generally, orthognathic.
  • Mandible has a protruding, bony chin (Homo sapiens are the only early hominid with this feature).
  • Due to the shortened jaw, the parabolic shape of the palate causes the side rows of teeth splay outwards rather than remain parallel, as in our earliest long jawed ancestors.        
  • Teeth are much smaller than in Neanderthals. It is especially noticeable in the front incisors and canines.
  • In the lower jaw, the first premolar teeth have two cusps of equal size.
  • Face is reasonably small
  • Brow ridge is limited, and the forehead is tall.   
  • Back of the skull is rounded, which indicates a reduction in neck muscles.
  • Lower, squarer eye orbits.
  • Presence of a canine fossa (hollowed cheeks).  
  • Flatter, more angled cheek bones.
  • Longer curved of the parietal and occipital bones.
  • No retro-molar gap behind the third premolar.
  • More prominent mastoid process (especially in males).     
 Source: Dorey, F. (January 4th, 2011). Homo sapiens- modern humans. Australian Museum. Retrieved on November 12th, 2012, from http://australianmuseum.net.au/Homo-sapiens-modern-humans/

Example of these features . . .
This skull, named Skhul 5, was found in Skhul Cave at Mount Carmel, Israel. Although the Skhul 5 skull has more robust brow ridges, as seen in Neanderthals and earlier Homo ancestors, it also has a rounded brain case, a high vertical forehead, and lacks a projecting occipital bun (which is present in many Neanderthal remains).
 Source: Smithsonian Institution. What does it mean to be human?. Retrieved November 12th, 2012, from http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/fossils/skh%25C5%25ABl-v



Post-Crania Features:
  •  Long limb bones are thinner, and less robust. This indicates reduced musculature compared to Neanderthals.
  •  Smaller shaft proportions relative to limb length.
  •  Smaller measures of articular limb length relative to limb proportions.
  • The femora lack midshaft flattening and excess internal thickening of the cortical bone.
  • metacarpals and metatarsals (finger and toe bones) are straight, and don't have a curvature.
  • Pelvis is narrower from side-to-side.
  • Pelvis has a deeper 'bowl' shape from front-to-back.
  • Early male Homo sapiens had an average height of 175cm, and females had and average height of 160 cm.
  • Slender trunks and long limbs.   
Source: Dorey, F. (January 4th, 2011). Homo sapiens- modern humans. Australian Museum. Retrieved on November 12th, 2012, from http://australianmuseum.net.au/Homo-sapiens-modern-humans/


This video is an EXCELLENT source for understanding the differences between modern and archaic human skulls.

Morphological Features of Neanderthals:

Cranial Features:
  • Cranial capacity: ≈1300-1800 cc
  • Suprainiac fossa (a groove above inion).
  • Large, protruding occipital bun.
  • Heavy mid-face prognathism.
  • Less neotenized skull than Homo sapiens.
  • Low, flat, elongated skull.
  • A flat basicranium.
  • Supraorbital torus (large brow ridge).
  • Lack a protruding chin.
  • Presence of a crest on the mastoid process behind the ear opening.
  • No groove on canine teeth.
  • A retromolar space posterior to the third molar.
  • Bony projections on the sides of the nasal openings, and a projecting nose.
  • Distinctive shape of the bony labyrinth.
  • Larger mental foramen in the mandible for increased blood supply.         
Source: Wikipedia. (November 8th, 2012). Neanderthal Anatomy. Wikipedia. Retrieved on November 11th, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_anatomy

   Both of the images above show the differences between between cranial morphology in Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens.

Neanderthal Post-cranial Features:
  • Considerably more robust in stature; stronger build.
  • Long collar bones, wider shoulders.
  • Barrel-shaped rib cage.
  • Short, bowed shoulder blades.
  • More laterally curved radius with a radial tuberosity placed more medially.
  • Longer radial neck.
  • More ovoid radially head.
  • Well developed interosseous crest.
  • The trochlear notch on the ulna faces more anteriorly.
  • The brachialis insertion is lower, and the mid-shaft is larger and more sinusoidal.
  • Larger round fingertips.
  • Thick, bowed shaft of the thigh bones and femur.
  • Short shinbones and calf bones.
  • Longer torso.
  • Proportionally shorter legs.
  • Long superior pubic ramus.  
Source: Wikipedia. (November 8th, 2012). Neanderthal Anatomy. Wikipedia. Retrieved on November 11th, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal_anatomy

Again, the video above does an excellent job explaining the intricacies of Neanderthal and Homo sapien morphology and evolution.


The short video above shows how scientists recreate a Neanderthal man from skeletal remains.

Now for the fun stuff. . . 

Everything I just mentioned is, in the grand scheme of things, simple facts that only help us understand the complexities of early hominid existence. What I am truly interested in is how these morphological features played into the development of symbolic practices, such as hunting and burial practices. More importantly, did any of these morphological features have an impact on the Neanderthal extinction?

It is commonly known that Neanderthals are very well adapted for cold climates, which is also in accordance with Bergmann's and Allen's rules. They had wider noses to heat the cold air before it enters their lungs, and their heavy brow ridges protect their eyes from the sun. So, in terms of hunting practices that developed out of these skeletal traits, we often see the pattern of injuries among Neanderthals resemble those of rodeo performers, which suggests that they hunted with weapons that required them to get close to very large animals. We know this from our previous discussion of lithics.

Since some Neanderthals apparently lived a long time after serious injuries, such as tooth loss, partial paralysis, and severe broken bones, it has been suggested that Neanderthals potentially took care of the sick, injured, and old. For example, at La Chapelle-aux-Saints there was a specimen found that was and old male (roughly 45), with incapacitating arthritis of jaw, back, hip, and almost no teeth. There is also evidence of an old man being taking care of at the site of Shanidar. This old man had crushed eye orbits, and was most likely paralyzed. However, yet evidence of atrophy and healing showed on the bones, which tells us he was most likely cared for.

In Homo sapiens, there are many more instances of symbolic practices being used. This is potentially because cognitively modern Homo sapiens would have had more "old, experienced people around than did previous hominids. This might have increased their ability to accumulate experience and knowledge, and for younger individuals to learn from older ones, encouraging varied local cultures and more rapid cultural change." (Source: Owen College. (2008). Neanderthals and homo sapiens. Owen College. Retrieved on November 12th, 2012, from bruceowen.com)

The evidenced just discussed points out that there were obvious instances of lifestyle practices that developed out of the specific morphology of Neanderthals, but it doesn't really point to any good explanations for the Neanderthal extinction. However, this doesn't mean their morphology didn't play a large role in their extinction. As I mentioned before, the Neanderthals were best adapted for colder climates. So while Neanderthal morphology didn't lead to the creation of vast symbolic and cultural practices, it did most likely play a leading role in their extinction as the climate changed rapidly. So for next time: climate change and environment. How did it affect the both species?